The Australian Institute of Sport (AIS) mission is to lead and enable a united high performance (HP) system that supports Australian athletes/teams to achieve podium success.
Evidence level: Scientific evidence not supportive of benefit amongst athletes OR no research undertaken to guide an informed opinion
Use within Supplement Programs: Not advocated for use by athletes within Supplement Programs May be permitted for use by identified athletes where there is specific approval from, or reporting to, a Sports Supplement Panel.
The list in this group is identified as “examples” to note and may not be complete.
Specific Group C supplements are identified which had previously been classified as Group B. Based on the most recent research, support for their use is less compelling.
Name / Formulation and description: Magnesium (Mg2+) - as in Magnesium Oxide
Current AIS Supplement Framework Classification: Group C Agreed AIS Supplement Framework Classification: Group C
squiz-36182_Supplements-fact-sheets_Magnesium-v3-002-AB-GRC.pdf
Magnesium plays an important role in many functions in the body. Under normal conditions, dietary intake and GI function, the human body is able to absorb and maintain magnesium at homeostatic levels.
It is thought that magnesium losses through sweat may be greater due to high training volumes in athletes resulting in suboptimal magnesium levels.
Regarding improvements in blood pressure, magnesium plays an important role in muscle contraction and thus correction of deficiency is thought to assist in contract of blood vessels and improvement in blood pressure.
Magnesium and its role in the stress response is not yet clear. Magnesium deficiency is thought to contribute to a HPA axis disbalance and associated mood disorders.1
Overall evidence is equivocal regarding whether Mg supplementation in the realm of RDIs provides a benefit to recovery in athletes. Further exploration of whether any benefit seen is due to suboptimal baseline magnesium levels is needed, as well as larger sample sizes and studies being conducted in both men and women.
Evidence to this point would suggest supplementation does not offer a performance benefit to trained athletes with sufficient dietary intake. Small scale studies suggest it may improve 1RM and countermovement jumps in trained athletes however larger scale studies needed.
Even with consideration for those with suboptimal dietary intake (due to restrictive diets for body composition, due to food beliefs etc.) diet manipulation likely remains the preferred strategy for correction. Given the difficulty in assessing actual Mg status, possible use of a batch tested multivitamin may assist in achieving RDIs if clinical assessment leads to suspicion of suboptimal intake
Where nutritional intake is adequate, and no prexisting bony injury, ingestion of addition magnesium may show little benefit to athletes. The consensus of the group was to maintain classification as Group C supplement. It may be included in a “bone pack in conjunction with Calcium and Vitamin D, to complement bone healing in athletes with traumatic or stress fractures.5
Name / Formulation and description: Alpha lipoic acid (ALA) is synthesised enzymatically in the mitochondria from octanoic acid and plays a critical role in mitochondrial energy metabolism. ALA presents as two enantiomers: the R-(+) enantiomer, which is widely present in nature and is biologically active, and the S-(-) enantiomer, which is often included in synthetic-based ALA supplements but is believed to have limited biological activity.1
Formulations includes:
Current AIS Supplement Framework Classification: Group C Agreed AIS Supplement Framework Classification: Group C
36182_Supplements-fact-sheets_ALA-v7.pdf
*approved for treatment of diabetic neuropathies in Germany2
Antioxidant: ALA acts as an antioxidant through free radical scavenging in vitro.3; 4 However, since ALA only transiently accumulates in tissues in vivo, the significance of direct free radical scavenging activity by ALA in vivo is questionable.5 It is more likely that ALA acts as an indirect antioxidant in vivo that induces or maintains endogenous antioxidant levels.5 ALA can increase glutathione levels within cells.6; 7 ALA can also regenerate reduced vitamin C and vitamin E from their respective oxidized vitamin forms. A pro-oxidant effect of ALA has also been described in experimental studies when relatively high concentrations of ALA are achieved. However, this pro-oxidant effect is believed to occur at levels typically higher than those observed in human studies using oral or intravenous infusion of ALA.8
Diabetic control: Studies that investigated the effects of ALA on diabetes control related to its role in inhibiting glycation reactions and the antioxidant mechanisms of action.
Weight loss: ALA may promote body weight and fat mass reduction via decreasing food intake and enhancing energy expenditure, possibly via suppression of hypothalamic AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity.9; 10
Sporting/exercise applications: Limited studies in humans show improvements in systemic markers of oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity following muscle-damaging exercise with short-term ALA supplementation11. Evidence from animal studies shows inconclusive effects on skeletal muscle oxidative stress, antioxidant enzymes, mitochondrial biogenesis, and endurance performance.11 Some studies conducted in humans have investigated markers of muscle damage during recovery following an intense muscle-damaging exercise bout with supplementation with ALA (600 mg/day) for 8-10 days.12; 13 Zembron-Lacny et al.13 reported significantly lower creatine kinase following combined submaximal endurance exercise and a muscle damaging eccentric downhill treadmill run, while Zembron-Lacny et al.12 reported no significant effect of ALA supplementation on either creatine kinase or lactate dehydrogenase levels following muscle damaging eccentric resistance exercise.
Diabetes: ALA has been found to reduce micro- and macro-vascular diabetic complications in rodents14; 15 and improve neuropathic pain in rodents16 and humans.2 ALA has also been shown to improve insulin sensitivity in rodents1 and humans17 with diabetes.
Weight loss: a recent meta-analysis of RCTs found a small but significant mean weight loss of 1.27 (95% CI -2.29 to -0.25) kg in clinical patients across studies using doses of 300-1800 mg LA per day for between 8-52 weeks.18
There is an overall lack of studies in humans investigating sporting/exercise-related outcomes, and no conclusive evidence to currently support ALA supplementation for benefits on endurance performance or muscle recovery from intense exercise.
Studies in diabetes are promising, however evidence is mainly limited to rodent data and small, short-term studies in patients with diabetes.
Evidence for weight loss benefits suggest only small weight loss benefits that are arguably not of clinical significance for overweight/obese individuals.
Lacking evidence for improved health or performance in athlete populations.
Name / Formulation and description: ß-hydroxy ß-methylbutyrate (HMB) is a metabolite of the essential branch chain amino acid leucine, claimed to decrease muscle protein breakdown associated with exercise, increasing muscle mass and strength development associated with resistance training. HMB is also claimed to reduce muscle damage/soreness, enhancing recovery. Much of the initial research on HMB focused on animals, assessing the effect on carcass mass and quality, immune function, morbidity and mortality, colostral milk fat content, growth rates, safety and toxicity. Despite unconvincing results in animal research, HMB supplementation was applied to humans in the mid 1990’s under the presumption that it may enhance gains in muscle size and strength while reducing muscle damage and soreness associated with resistance training and possibly enhance aerobic capacity.1
Two forms of HMB have been used: Calcium HMB (HMB-Ca) and a free acid form of HMB (HMB-FA). HMB-FA may increase plasma absorption and retention of HMB to a greater extent than HMB-CA. However, research with HMB-FA is in its infancy, and there is not enough research to support whether one form is superior.
Current AIS Supplement Framework Classification: Group B (Other) Agreed AIS Supplement Framework Classification: Group C
36182_Supplements-fact-sheets_HMB-v3.pdf
HMB induces acute muscle anabolism via increased in muscle protein synthesis (MPS) and reduced muscle protein breakdown (MPB).2
While there is evidence to show acute HMB supplementation does stimulate MPS and moderate MPB, the effect is less than leucine ingestion alone and significantly less than acute whey protein ingestion.2 Acute HMB supplementation does not appear to influence serum testosterone and cortisol levels3 , nor indices of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein.4 There is preliminary evidence suggesting potential benefit in mitigating disuse atrophy, at least in older individuals.5
When contrasted against accepted dietary interventions like post-exercise whey protein ingestion, HMB does not appear to further augment the response.6 Concerns have been raised about the integrity of recently published data on HMB supplementation across a 12-week training period, given the significance of the response.7
While there is some evidence supporting the claims that HMB supplementation favourably influences skeletal muscle protein metabolism, efficacy is significantly less than that of leucine alone, and much less than acute ingestion of high biological value proteins. As such, these more efficacious interventions should be prioritised over HMB.
Name / Formulation and description: Branched chain amino acids (BCAA i.e. leucine, isoluceine and valine usually in a 2:1:1 ratio) and leucine in isolation are purified amino acids appearing as crystalline powders. They are poorly soluble in water and bitter tasting. The sources of the protein from which BCAA/ LEU are derived from are not immediately apparent on the packaging of many products. However, there are several sources1:
There is some concern that they may also be derived from human hair.1
Current AIS Supplement Framework Classification: Group B Agreed AIS Supplement Framework Classification: Group C
36182_Supplements-fact-sheets_BCAA-v4.pdf
BCAAs are essential amino acids metabolised primarily within the skeletal muscle and they play an important role in both cellular energy homeostasis2 and in the regulation of muscle protein synthesis.3 Theoretically, by supporting energy metabolism and by stimulating muscle protein synthesis it is suggested that BCAA/ leucine may support muscle growth. Furthermore, there is some evidence that BCAA/leucine supplementation may assist in the recovery from muscle damaging exercise via similar mechanisms to those described above.
Finally, BCAA supplementation may provide substrate to working muscle under glycogen depleted conditions and due to BCAA competition for transport into the brain with tryptophan, BCAA supplementation may limit tryptophan entry into the brain. Theoretically this would reduce serotonin production in the brain and limit the onset of fatigue.4
The evidence for BCAA/leucine supplementation supporting endurance performance is equivocal.4 A recent study5 suggests that 20 g of BCAA ingested 1hr prior to a ramp test on a treadmill can delay fatigue. However, like much of the BCAA literature around endurance performance/fatigue there are significant flaws in the research. In the case of 5 the placebo is not matched for calories. A thorough analysis of the most recent research on BCAA and endurance performance is needed to determine their efficacy for promoting performance. There is a great deal of heterogeneity in the literature around supplementation protocols and dosing strategies and so firm recommendations on this are difficult. There is an argument however, that because BCAAs become significant substrates during prolonged exercise that supplementing may prevent muscle damage/breakdown, but there is little evidence to support this notion. For instance, 20 g of BCAA supplemented before and during a 100 km race (3 g 1hr before followed by 17 g throughout a 100 km race) did not affect performance or markers of muscle damage.6
There is building evidence for BCAA supplementation to augment the response to damaging exercise. A meta-analysis of the literature from 2007-2013 suggests that BCAA supplementation may significantly reduce the severity of delayed onset muscle soreness following damaging exercise when compared to placebo treatments.7 Additionally, a systematic literature review carried out on research published up to August 2017 suggests that there may be a modest benefit of BCAA supplementation for markers of muscle damage.8 In an analysis of the dosing strategies in this systematic review8 it is suggested that a daily intake greater than 200 mg*kg*day-1 (~16 g) for at least 7 days prior to the damaging exercise may alleviate some of the impacts of muscle damage on muscle performance (force decrement, plasma CK). However, it should be noted that the placebo in all the included trials is devoid of any protein. So, it remains to be seen if BCAA supplementation would be better/worse than intact protein for this outcome measure. Furthermore, the systematic review suggests efficacy of BCAA supplementation only if the damage is low-moderate.
Because BCAA/leucine are critical for signalling to increase muscle protein synthesis3, it has long been thought that BCAA/leucine supplementation may enhance muscle protein synthesis and therefore growth in response to nutrition/exercise. However, the case for supplementing BCAA/leucine in isolation seems to be weak at best. For instance, when 5.6 g (equivalent content in 20 g of Whey) of BCAA were supplemented following a session of resistance exercise the resulting increase in muscle protein synthesis was only 22%.8 With intact protein we would expect this stimulatory response on muscle protein synthesis to be at least double that. So, whilst BCAAs, when taken in isolation following resistance exercise, can stimulate muscle protein synthesis they probably should not be recommended over whole foods containing sufficient high-quality protein. However, there may be a case for utilising BCAA/leucine to “top up” the anabolic potential of sub-optimal meals. The leucine content of a meal seems to be the key driver of the anabolic response (muscle protein synthesis) to that meal. Approximately 2.5 g of leucine per meal (equivalent to ~20 g of whey protein) seems to be sufficient to maximise muscle protein synthesis.3 Furthermore, when a suboptimal dose of whey protein (6.25 g whey, 0.75 g of leucine) in a mixed macronutrient beverage is “topped up” with leucine to contain 3 g of leucine, it produces a similar muscle protein synthesis response in the recovery from resistance exercise as 25 g of whey protein (3g of leucine).9 These data suggest that leucine could be used to enhance the anabolic potential of certain meals that may not, on their own, maximise muscle protein synthesis. This could take the form of supplementing sub-optimal meals (plant-based meals, meals with less than 20-30 g of high-quality protein) with up to 3 g of additional leucine. However, we do not know if this strategy would support muscle growth in the long term.
Endurance performance: The evidence on the role of BCAA/leucine in supporting endurance performance or preventing damage from long duration activity is very heterogeneous and equivocal. From the literature so far, a clear dosing strategy cannot reliably be suggested especially considering that the placebo is often not optimal for assessing outcomes. There is probably room in the literature for a systematic review/meta-analysis to address this aspect of BCAA/Leucine supplementation.
Muscle damage recovery: The evidence for BCAA supplementation in reducing the severity of symptoms following muscle damage protocols (drop jumps, repeated eccentric contractions) is building. But the benefits appear to be marginal and given that the placebo is often simply a calorically matched product devoid of protein it would be hard to argue for the supplementation protocol to be implemented in place of a sound diet with sufficient high quality protein. Furthermore, the supplementation protocols that seem to be effective (when compared against placebos containing no protein) are likely impractical given the large daily doses required (16-20 g).
Muscle anabolism: Where intact and high-quality protein can be consumed in sufficient quantities to maximise muscle anabolism there appears to be little-no need to supplement with BCAA/Leucine. However, where a meal is going to be sub-optimal for maximising muscle anabolism (plant based protein or less than 20-30 g of high quality protein) then there may be a benefit to supplementing that meal with leucine up to a total of 2.5-3 g of leucine. It should be noted that the “benefit” in this instance is purely for muscle protein synthesis and there is not yet firm evidence of this kind of dosing strategy augmenting other outcomes such as muscle growth, strength, or recovery in athletic populations.
While there is some evidence supporting the claims that BCAA/leucine supplementation favourably influences skeletal muscle protein metabolism, efficacy is significantly less than acute ingestion of high biological value proteins. As such, these more efficacious interventions should be prioritised over BCAA/leucine. The fortification of lower biological value proteins with additional BCAA/leucine to optimise muscle anabolism is recognised and discussed in a separate fact sheet on isolated protein supplements.
(Phosphorus)
Name / Formulation and description: Phosphorus is a non-metallic essential nutrient, with about 11–14 g phosphorus per kg of fat-free mass (FFM) stored in the human body. Of which ~85% is located in the skeletal system. Comes in three forms, including sodium, calcium & potassium phosphate. However, most research is on sodium phosphate.
Current AIS Supplement Framework Classification: Group B (Other) Agreed AIS Supplement Framework Classification: Group C
36182_Supplements-fact-sheets_Phosphate.pdf
Current investigations of phosphate supplementation have focused on the physiological and performance-related outcomes of laboratory protocols including graded exercise tests to exhaustion, the 30-s Wingate test, 6 × 20 m (~3– 4 s) repeat sprint efforts, and TT situations ranging in duration from 3–60 min. Overall, there is equivocal evidence of performance enhancement from phosphate supplementation.1
Proposed benefits include:
The proposed mechanisms underpinning these benefits include an enhanced rate of ATP and PCr resynthesis; improved buffering capacity to support high rates of anaerobic glycolysis; improvement of myocardial contractility leading to increased cardiac efficiency; and an increased erythrocyte 2,3 diphosphoglycerate 2,3 DPG concentration, leading to a reduced affinity of oxygen with haemoglobin and a greater unloading of oxygen to the peripheral tissues.
In some instances, phosphate has been shown to enhance VO2max 2, 3, anaerobic threshold3, and cycling TT performance.4 However, in the case of repeated sprints, the magnitude of benefit has been shown to be varied and unclear.5 Finally, there is also a large amount of contrary evidence from the same physiological and performance measures that suggests phosphate supplementation (in isolation, or in combination with other buffer agents) has no impact on exercise capacity or performance outcomes.6, 7, 8, 9
Current evidence regarding the efficacy of phosphate supplementation remains unclear, since there exists no evidence to suggest an accumulation of this supplement in the muscle, where a number of the reported mechanism are suggested to take effect.
Typically, phosphate supplementation is achieved over a 3–6 day period, with a total daily dose of ~50 mg/kg of fat-free mass (~3–5 g/ day) consumed in single or split doses throughout the day. This is often associated with GI distress.2, 9 However, tolerance is improved by concurrent consumption with ~300 ml of a carbohydrate-rich fluid.10
The use of this supplement for enhanced athletic performance is likely questionable, with further research needed to fully explore its true effect.
Name / Formulation and description: Vitamin E refers to lipid soluble compounds including four tocopherols and four tocotrienols, with α-tocopherol being the most biologically available and most well-known form. It is found in lipid rich structures such as the sarcoplasmic reticulum, where it scavenges free radicals produced by the mitochondria, thereby reducing lipid peroxidation and membrane damage.
Given Vitamin E is a fat-soluble vitamin, it is primarily found in higher fat, plant derived foods, including nuts and oils, and to a lesser extent in the fats of meat, poultry and fish. Both natural and synthetic forms of vitamin E can be found in vitamin E supplements, with the “d” prefix denoting natural forms, particularly d-alpha tocopherol; and the “dl” prefix denoting synthetic forms, particularly dl-alpha tocopheryl acetate. Vitamin E supplements are available in the form of tablets, capsules, powders or drops.
Current AIS Supplement Framework Classification: Group B Agreed AIS Supplement Framework Classification: Group C
36182_Supplements-fact-sheets_Vitamin-E-v2.pdf
Vitamin E appears to have a role in immune function, including increasing lymphocyte proliferation in response to mitogenic stimulation, increasing interleukin-2 production, decreasing interleukin-6 production and enhanced delayed type hypersensitivity response.1 Vitamin E has anti-oxidant properties, and is capable of scavenging lipidderived peroxyl radicals and terminating oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids.2,3
Overall, there is limited evidence to support the use of vitamin E for athletes.
Some studies have shown improvements in non-fatal myocardial infarction risk in patients with existing heart disease following vitamin E supplementation, however RCTs are generally not supportive of any benefits of vitamin E supplements in the primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.10
Some investigations have shown a potential blunting of skeletal muscle adaptations to endurance training with combined vitamin E and vitamin C supplementation.11-13 There is currently no convincing evidence that vitamin E supplements alone impair exercise-related adaptations in humans. While vitamin E is generally considered ‘safe’ even with intake well above RDI14, a meta-analysis of clinical trials of vitamin E supplementation across a range of different clinical conditions reported that adults who consume ≥400 IU/day were 6% more likely to die of any cause compared to no supplementation.15 Other meta-analyses of human RCTs have found that there is no risk of increased CVD mortality or all-cause mortality at doses of up to 800 IU/day.16-17
Chronic supplementation with vitamin E amongst athletic populations can not currently be supported. However, it is recognised that further research in this area is warranted. This includes research into the potential acute benefits of supplementation when immediate performance retention is desired, and adaptation is less important, such as during competition.
If moderating oxidative stress and inflammation are a priority, adapting a meal plan that focuses on unprocessed, conventional foods to include additional serves of mixed fruit and vegetables, plus nuts and extra virgin plant based oils should be a priority.
Name / Formulation and description: Tyrosine (TYR) is a dietary non-essential amino acid precursor for catecholamine neurotransmitter synthesis. Tyrosine is contained within protein-rich dietary sources and is synthesised in the liver from phenylalanine.
It is available:
Current AIS Supplement Framework Classification: Group B Agreed AIS Supplement Framework Classification: Group C
36182_Supplements-fact-sheets_Tyrosine-v3.pdf
During prolonged endurance exercise within the heat catecholamine turnover is increased compared to the same exercise in a temperate environment (i.e. the former accelerates fatigue compared to the latter, in part due to central catecholamine depletion of their major precursor TYR).2, 3
During acute stress, there is an observed increase in the activation of noradrenergic neurons in the frontal cortex, which release neurotransmitter as a response to stress.4 The continued release of neurotransmitter is fundamental in the ability to cope with stress, and thus as concentrations begin to deplete, aspects of cognitive function start to deteriorate.5 Therefore, oral supplementation of TYR is proposed to increase its ratio to other large neutral amino acids (LNAA) for competitive transport across the blood brain barrier, thus resulting in a greater cerebral uptake and an increase in dopamine (DA) synthesis in the brain6, 7; i.e. facilitative of prolonging/maintaining ‘optimal’/’minimal’ catecholamine/neurotransmitter presence/function. It is suggested that similar to the effects of physical/exercise/ mental stress and/or heat-stress, catecholamine concentrations also become depleted during exposure to other environmental stressors (e.g. cold and/or hypoxia).8
Physical Performance
Several studies have investigated the effects of TYR in relation to exercise performance in normal9-11 and elevated/ high ambient temperatures.12-15 All three of the studies conducted under temperate conditions failed to observe any beneficial effect of acute TYR ingestion on endurance performance9, 10 or strength and power performance.11 These findings are not surprising due to the questionable amount of stress experienced during exercise in normal ambient temperatures and the relationship between stress and catecholamine turnover.
Recent studies have therefore focused on passive and active heat-stress based designs to examine the influence of TYR under extreme stress. Data has shown significant improvement in exercise capacity (15 ± 11%) after ingestion of 150 mg/ kg body mass of TYR, compared to placebo when cycling to exhaustion in a hot environment (30°C; 50% RH).12 To date, this12 is the first and only study to observe a positive effect of TYR on physical performance, despite the efforts of others13 who attempted to replicate this study. Indeed, others13 reported TYR did not influence exercise capacity or any aspects of cognitive function (reaction time, information processing or memory) in the heat, despite a significant increase in plasma TYR concentration. Indeed, others14 employed a pre-loaded time-trial design based on the theory that a benefit of TYR would be more apparent during self-paced exercise due to the greater influence of behavioural thermoregulation, motivation and arousal compared to constant load exercise.2, 14 However, this was not the case, as TYR ingestion (150 mg/ kg body mass) did not influence time-trial performance when performed in a hot environment (30°C; 50% RH).14 Others15 examined the TYR ingestion (300 mg/ kg body mass) during exposure to a 90 min soccer-simulation protocol [iSPT16] in a warm environment (25°C; 40% RH); TYR had a positive effect on cognitive function (vigilance) and readiness to invest mental effort, but did not influence physical performance.
Cognitive Performance (heat/cold/hypoxia):
The majority of literature assessing the effects of TYR is military based, with several investigations conducted by the US Army Research Institute8, 17-20 and other army institutes.4, 21 These have primarily focused on aspects of cognitive function (complex; working memory, vigilance, tracking and simple reaction time; etc.) and mood during exposure to acute stress, such as such as cold8, 17, 20 and hypoxia17, and paradigms involving both extended wakefulness22 and the physical/emotional stress nexus.21 Each of these aforementioned studies has demonstrated improvements in specific aspects of cognitive function after ingestion of TYR (100-300 mg/ kg body mass; N.B. when 300 mg/ kg body mass of TYR is administered, it is typically via two equal dosages 4 hours apart).
TYR supplementation has direct mechanistic evidence that it can offset heat-induced delays in reaction time during 90 min passive exposure to 45°C; 30% RH.5 This study also assessed higher levels of cognitive function using advanced brain imaging techniques (event related potentials; ERP), providing evidence that heat exposure causes an increase in P300 (reduced concentration) and M100 latency (reduced ability to react to a warning) and a decrease in M100 amplitude (linked with attention) which returned to near normal levels after ingestion of TYR. It was concluded that the higher DA and norepinephrine (NE) concentrations detected in the TYR trial might have maintained cognitive function by alleviating the decrements associated with heat-stress.5 This5 is the only TYRheat- stress based study to assess DA and NE concentrations in combination with cognitive testing and advanced brain imaging, currently the ‘best’ quality evidence regarding the efficacy of TYR during heat-stress to mediate undesirable heat-mediated cognitive function declines.
There are a number of limitations to the current science. These include:
The consensus in available evidence suggests TYR does not have efficacy in improving physical performance (endurance or otherwise; irrelevant of environmental stressor(s)). Conversely to physical performance, TYR does have substantial evidence demonstrating its efficacy to improve aspects of cognitive performance during exposure to heat and/or exercise heat stress, however there have been limited investigations in elite athlete populations.